mobile security

news, reviews and going's on in the world of mobile security

McAfee mobile security study - more scareware?

Filed under: Vendor Specific — webmaster at 5:38 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2007

logo_mcafee.png

I just found this article (I’ve been out of the loop for most of February) and couldn’t help but write something. If the claims in here are to be believed, we are in the middle of a mobile virus pandemic. There are some very interesting statistics:

The Situation Today
The purpose of the study was to discover to what extent mobile operators are affected by mobile threats. The findings revealed that:

* 83 percent of mobile operators questioned have been hit by mobile device infections
* The number of reported security incidents in 2006 was more than five times as high as in 2005
* The number of mobile operators in Europe and APAC reporting incidents affecting more than 1,000 devices more than doubled in 2006
* 100 percent more operators spent over $200,000 on mobile security in 2006 compared to 2005
* The number of mobile operators estimating that the cost of dealing with mobile threats is more than 1000 hours increased by 700 percent

Good grief! This all looks like pretty hairy stuff. And there’s more…

Nearly one-third (29 percent) of operators stated that subscriber satisfaction had suffered more than any other factor including revenue. The second most serious impact from mobile malware infections was on network performance.

Revenue? Network performance? Switch to DEFCON 1. Get me the president!

Whilst I will agree that mobile devices are becoming more of a target, it doesn’t mean history is going to necessarily repeat itself (with respect to Windows), although that’s not to say MS mobile platforms couldn’t do without a patch or two.

And perhaps McAfee could update their mobile site. Are they really are the only company in the world to have deployed a mobile suite? I think not.

UPDATE: It seems someone at McAfee took heed and their mobile site has been updated.  Original web page text from here.

No Tags
Powered by Gregarious (41) Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe in Rojo gritwire Add to Technorati Favorites!

4 Comments »

393

Comment by flosse

2 March, 2007 @ 10:28 am

You got to love marketing… “study”.. I am sure it was a study… I think they call it market intelligence. And with the current “scare” of security, mobile security is a good area to bank on for a AV vendor.. not much definition updates etc….

398

Comment by Admin

2 March, 2007 @ 10:55 am

Hi Flosse,

Yes, I guess support costs are lower than on the windows side. And from a risk management perspective, some companies (banks/financial institutions) will insist on having mobile AV even if no threats exist for the platform they are using (eg. S60 3rd Ed).

415

Comment by webmaster

2 March, 2007 @ 4:36 pm

If anyone needs to renew their McAfee antivirus subscription (or from any other mainstream vendor), remember this rule of thumb: “it is always cheaper to buy new than to renew”:

http://news.faster.sk/2007/03/02/security-software-costs-more-to-renew-than-buy-new/

Comment by Jari

15 March, 2007 @ 8:05 pm

This is probably the sixth study I’ve either seen or heard in past 12 months. Thats like one every second month. Some consultants are making good money either re-writing reports or doing same street interviews over again..=) Just kidding. But the funny part is that there’s less seldom any real good proposal included. One thing I would like to see some big telco giant or operator alliance or something coming out with a public view instead of pure expert or security company opinion. Theres many moving parts and lot of differences in the mobile world. Take Japan or US for example.

Have a good one - nice blog by the way. Greetings from warmer and warmer Helsinki, spring is coming.. finally! =)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
Socialized through Gregarious 41